California Law Enforcement Abused State Database to Improperly Vet Concealed Carry Applicants

CALIFORNIA — A recent report by the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) has revealed that law enforcement agencies across California misused state-run databases more than 7,000 times in 2023. This widespread abuse raises serious concerns for law-abiding concealed carriers who rely on their right to privacy and due process.

The Scope of the Issue

The misuse primarily involved unauthorized access to the California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System (CLETS), which contains sensitive records, including criminal histories, driver’s license information, and concealed carry permit data. Among the most concerning violations, the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department (LASD) was found to have repeatedly violated specific rules against using CLETS to conduct improper background checks on individuals applying for concealed carry permits. Beyond this, officers also accessed the database for personal reasons—running checks on acquaintances, business associates, and romantic partners. In some cases, CLETS data was even unlawfully shared or sold.

EFF’s findings show that violations were not isolated incidents but occurred across multiple agencies, highlighting systemic issues with oversight and accountability. Given California’s strict gun control laws and the sensitive nature of concealed carry permit data, this level of database abuse is particularly alarming.

Concerns for Concealed Carriers

For those who legally carry concealed in California, this report underscores a major privacy risk. Law enforcement officials have access to CCW permit records, and unauthorized use of these databases could expose gun owners to potential harassment, discrimination, or even targeted theft. The state’s history of restricting gun rights—including past leaks of CCW permit holder information—makes it clear that database security must be a top priority.

A key concern is whether permit holders’ personal data could be accessed or shared without justification. In a state where the right to bear arms is already heavily regulated, any misuse of law enforcement tools to track or scrutinize gun owners erodes public trust.

Lack of Accountability

Despite the thousands of violations, few officers faced significant disciplinary action. The report indicates that punishments often amounted to brief suspensions or administrative reprimands. Without meaningful consequences, the risk of continued misuse remains high.

California residents, particularly those who carry concealed, should be aware of these issues and demand stronger safeguards for their personal information. If law enforcement agencies cannot properly regulate access to sensitive databases, it raises questions about the security of all personal data stored by the state.

Takeaways for CCW Holders

For concealed carriers, this report highlights the importance of privacy awareness:

• Be mindful of who knows you carry. The fewer people aware of your CCW status, the lower the risk of unauthorized searches or potential targeting.
• Monitor your personal data. If you suspect your information has been accessed improperly, you may be able to file a records request or complaint.
• Support data privacy laws. Stronger regulations and enforcement are necessary to prevent government overreach and protect law-abiding gun owners.
• Stay informed. Cases like this emphasize why concealed carry permit holders must stay up to date on laws, rights, and potential threats to their privacy.

This is not the first time California’s handling of gun owner data has been called into question, and unless stricter oversight is enforced, it likely won’t be the last.